Pages

Tuesday, February 01, 2022

Not Always the Best

 I am busy preparing training, as I always seem to be these days, but something in the regs made me giggle:

"A pilot who accepts an aircraft with defects, the repair of which has been deferred in accordance with an approved system, has a good defence against any possible charge of flying an unairworthy aircraft, whereas a pilot who undertakes a flight with an aircraft that is not in compliance with the approved system commits an offence."

So what they are saying is that a good offence is not always the best defence. Or perhaps this would be a bad offence.

2 comments:

  1. In other words, ensure your flyable state is signed off by a maintenance authority and your ass is covered...
    Seems to work with all airborne devices, from hot air balloons (my main world) to airliners (as discussed with friends of mine :) ).
    Good to see you still posting. Take care out there! :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Does the context of that regulation make it clear that it means "A pilot who unknowingly accepts an aircraft with defects..."?

    ReplyDelete

Comments on aviation issues unrelated to the current post are fine, as are civil side conversations between commenters. If a discussion continues for more than one day, please keep it on the same post.

If you include a link, please make it clickable using the format
<a href="http://yoururl.com">click here</a>

MAKE YOUR LINKS CLICKABLE! PLEASE DO THIS FOR ME!