tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10000144.post112249016701320975..comments2024-03-13T09:47:40.487+00:00Comments on Cockpit Conversation: Legal Alternate: Part OneAviatrixhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13634111275860140084noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10000144.post-48568858682661060262007-11-26T02:37:00.000+00:002007-11-26T02:37:00.000+00:00yes600-2 can become: 700-1.5 -o...yes<BR/><BR/>600-2 can become: <BR/><BR/>700-1.5<BR/> -or-<BR/> 800-1<BR/><BR/>Non Precision<BR/><BR/>800-2 can become: <BR/><BR/>900-1.5<BR/> -or-<BR/> 1000-1Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10000144.post-1123000633835121182005-08-02T16:37:00.000+00:002005-08-02T16:37:00.000+00:00I was specifically instructed that that was the ca...I was specifically instructed that that was the case when I learned the rule initially, and I know my interpretation has the approval of the check pilots and IFR examiners I have encountered. I'm looking for documented proof.<BR/><BR/>What else would "separate runways" mean? Would anyone ever call 13L and 31R "separate runways?"Aviatrixhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13634111275860140084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10000144.post-1122980173836634552005-08-02T10:56:00.000+00:002005-08-02T10:56:00.000+00:00It never occurred to me that the "separate suitabl...It never occurred to me that the "separate suitable runways" in the CAP GEN alternate minima might refer to separate runway <EM>surfaces</EM> -- thanks for a new POV.<BR/><BR/>I cannot find a formal definition of "runway" in either the CAP GEN or the AIP. Has Transport Canada clarified this reg somewhere?<BR/><BR/>Note that this is all purely academic: I'm not picking an alternate that's forecast to be only 400-1 no matter how many ILS approaches it has.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com